A healer is a healer; their role is to keep people alive. There is no rezzer in the trinity the last time I checked. The ability to rez people after they die is so unimportant to the overall goal of keeping people alive to begin with that I don't understand why people are upset that healers are not the only ones that can do it. It's out of combat, which is a time that is so irrelevant as to need no argument. If they gave the warrior an ability called "Rally" that rezzed everyone within 10 yards for 30 seconds, would that be a rez? Was the DeathKnight in WoW's ability to turn a downed party member into a ghoul, a rez? Yes, but both have limitations and no one complained that they made healers less useful. Healers are meant to prevent death. If you go with the classic priest archtypes the concept of bringing people back to life was either a divine power or seen as necromancy and considered bad. Healer does not equal rezzer. If you really want to limit rezzing to a particular class archtype then it would be your priests, clarics and paladins. It would be your warlocks, necromancers and witchdoctors that would bring corpses back to life. At any rate, this is a Sci-fi/fantasy game. I'm a network technician in real life, but I know CPR and how to use a defibrillator; which means I can potentially bring people back from the brink of death. I'm not a Doctor, who'd be the healer and who's job it is to keep people from dying and who can also do CPR and use a defibrillator.